Sustainable 3D Printing of Recycled PET: Influence of Infill Architecture and Layer Thickness on Mechanical Behavior

Open

Rahmat Doni Widodo, Muhammad Irfan Nuryanta, Muhammad Akhsin Muflikhun

2026 Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing Vol. 10 Issue 6 Article Cited by 0 Quartile

Abstract

The utilization of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste from single-use packaging offers potential for sustainable manufacturing. This study evaluates recycled PET (rPET) from bottles as an FDM filament by varying infill architectures (honeycomb, gyroid, grid, and triangles) and layer thicknesses (0.20, 0.25, and 0.30 mm), with commercial PETG as a benchmark. Compared with previous rPET FDM studies, which were limited to reporting mechanical strength, the novelty of this study lies in the fact that it not only reports mechanical strength performance, but also compares printing time requirements and material efficiency. Efficiency calculations are obtained by comparing the weight of the filament to the weight of the printed specimen, which then correlates with optimizing processing time and costs. Overall, rPET produced densities of 1.11–1.22 g/cm3, tensile strengths of 12.5–22.5 MPa, flexural strengths of 12.5–30 MPa, impact strengths of 0.032–0.060 J/mm2, and surface roughnesses of Ra 5.2–7.1 μm, while PETG showed higher mechanical performance (tensile 30–39.5 MPa, flexural 30–50 MPa, impact 0.037–0.065 J/mm2) and comparable density (1.15–1.27 g/cm3). Within rPET, gyroid provided the best optimal performance; the gyroid (0.20 mm) variation achieved the highest impact response (0.060 J/mm2) and the lowest Ra (5.2 μm) and the gyroid (0.25 mm) variation maximized flexural strength (30 MPa) and the gyroid (0.30 mm) variation maximized tensile strength (22.5 MPa). Material utilization efficiency was consistently higher for rPET (65–68%) than for PETG (46–56%). These results provide an integrated rPET-specific assessment and practical parameter recommendations for functional 3D printing, while also aligning with SDG 12 by pro-moting resource-efficient circular-economy practices through the utilization of waste materials in additive manufacturing. © 2026 by the authors.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, 50229, Indonesia; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia